Planning & Urban Development Department | 389 Congress Street | Portland, Maine 04101
Waterfront Master Planning Public Process Timeline

1. Community Input Forums. Fall 2000.

Six forums were conducted to collect citizen input from a wide selection of stakeholders and citizens. Approximately 300 citizens participated.

2. Community Design Workshop. Jan. 2001.

A two-day interactive workshop was held where 165 citizen and approximately 40 City Staff and consultant participants provided graphic and written input to the master planning process.

3. Waterfront Development and Master Planning Committee
Marine Passenger Facility Committee
Summer 2000 to Jan. 2002.

4. Community Development Committee – CDC (Comprised of three members of the City Council.) Spring 2002.

5. Community Presentation Forums (hosted by the CDC) May 2002.

6. City Council. Master Plan Report accepted and forwarded to Planning Board. June 2002. Ocean Gateway phase one adopted.

7. Planning Board Master Plan Review. Summer 2002.

8.  Planning Board Recommendation Vote on the Master Plan. September 10, 2004.

9. Planning Board Zoning Process. Between January 2003 and September 2004, the Planning Board held 15 meeting reviewing iterations of Eastern Waterfront Zoning.

10. Interim Zoning for allowing the Eastern Waterfront Parking Garage RFP. August 2003 to November 2003. Two meetings each by the Planning Board and the City Council.

11. Ocean Gateway Permit Process. Planning Board held 6 meetings between November 2003 and May 2004, resulting in the approval of the Ocean Gateway project under the site plan and sub-division ordinances.

12.  B-6 Zone with Building Height Overlay September 2004. Planning Board votes (1) to recommend the Building Height Study as an amendment to the Eastern Waterfront Master Plan and (2) to recommend the B-6 zone.

13. Plan Adoption. City Council adopts the Eastern Waterfront Master Plan, with the Design Guidelines and Height Study, into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Separately, the Council adopts the B-6 zone with amendments.

Public Process Narrative

1. Community Input Forums

Community Forums: City staff and the Waterfront Committee organized and held six (6) Community Forums from early November 2000 through early January 2001. The Forums were widely publicized through press releases, posters and printed public notices in local papers. Participation was open to any interested citizen although special effort was made to involve citizens within the study area and impact areas. 278 citizens participated in the forums providing significant public insight and background for the Community Design Workshop and the continuing waterfront planning process.

The objectives of the Community Forums were:

The forum participants were asked to participate in two exercises to collect data for the waterfront planning in Portland. The first exercise was a visual preference survey where participants rated, positively or negatively, their reaction to fifty photographs of waterfront development. Second, the participants were separated into break out groups and were asked to report their "dreams and nightmares" for development in the Eastern Waterfront.

The results of the forums were complied and provided background for the Community Design Workshop and through out the waterfront planning process.

2. Working Principles Survey

The Working Principles from the Waterfront Task Force Report, adopted 1/20/99, were tested with participants to various Waterfront Community Forums and the Community Design Workshop (see below.) Fifty-five (55) participants responded to the questionnaire in which they were asked to rate each of the Working Principles with a score of between –3 (strongly disagree) to +3 (strongly agree). Below, the average score from the 55 respondents is listed besides the principle.

"Working Principles" from the Waterfront Task Force Report

Adopted on 1/20/99

  1. Any proposal should encourage long-term enhancement of waterfront economics (cost of doing business, available infrastructure) and sustainable waterfront-related employment with good-paying jobs. (Average: +2.05)
  2. Development should provide adaptable, flexible infrastructure that will allow the City to adjust to future technologies and trends.

    (Average: +1.89)

  3. Any harbor uses should remain marine-related and ideally should take advantage of the natural deep-water resources of the area.

    (Average: +2.01)

  4. Traffic and parking in the area must be adequately addressed.

    (Average: +2.65)

  5. Public access should be maintained.

    (Average: +2.98)

  6. Any proposed development will require an analysis of the fiscal and management impact on the City (see recommendations below).

    (Average: +2.01)

  7. Any development should be compatible with the prevailing uses in the surrounding neighborhoods, and must pay particular attention to issues of noise, traffic and parking, air quality and scale.

(Average: +2.36)

3. COMMUNITY DESIGN WORKSHOP FOR THE PORTLAND WATERFRONT

January 19 & 20, 2001

The WATERFRONT MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE and the ‘OCEAN GATEWAY’ FACILITY COMMITTEE held a full day Community Design Workshop as means to collect public input and vision in an interactive forum. Drawings, text and survey results collected from this event helped to direct and guide the results and process reflected in the full Committee report. The City, in partnership with the Maine Department of Transportation, invited interested citizens to participate in a Community Design Workshop in order that City Councilors, staff and technical consultants could hear and see issues of interest and concern. Participants used maps, plans, and written guidelines to graphically and verbally represent their vision for the eastern waterfront.

On January 19th and 20th on 2001, 165 Portland area citizens – neighborhood and island residents, volunteer architects and landscape architects, property and business owners, and public officials - came together with a team of city staff and technical consultants to help craft a vision for the redevelopment of the eastern portion of Portland’s waterfront. All participants attended a Friday evening briefing to view the city’s consultant latest schematic designs for a new marine passenger facility to be located on the city-owned property at the Maine State Pier and the Bath Iron Works site. On Saturday, the participants were divided into 15 teams, with about 12 people per team, given maps, paper and markers, and asked to draw their own conclusions.

As part of a long range planning effort, the City of Portland sought community input regarding (1) the design of a new marine passenger facility to be located at the Maine State Pier property, and (2) development of the surrounding waterfront neighborhood.

The Community Design Workshop was a mid-term step in a long-term process of waterfront planning which provided citizens opportunity to reflect on prior decisions and to direct the future direction of planning and facility design. The program for the facility had been established through an earlier decision process and included four distinct elements:

The citizen participants were given two specific tasks:

1. Evaluate three potential facility designs for a new international ferry terminal. These preliminary designs were produced for the Ocean Gateway Facility Committee by a team of consultants led by Woodard and Curran Engineers.

2. Establish a vision of the surrounding neighborhood, which integrates the Ocean Gateway facility.

Participants looked at the Facility and an adjacent Study Area with respect to traffic circulation, future building and street development, public access, views, environmental issues, urban design and historic preservation.

Participants also looked at the proposed facility and master planning effort with regards to impacts on five identified Impact Areas: Commercial Street, the Old Port, India Street, Munjoy Hill, and the Casco Bay Islands.

The objectives of the Waterfront Design Workshop were:

The written and graphic results of the workshop provided valuable and formative guidance to the two waterfront planning committees throughout the remainder of the master planning process.

4.Waterfront Development and Master Planning Committee and the Marine Passenger Facility Committee Process

From the summer of 2000 to January 2002, the Waterfront Development and Master Planning Committee (Master Planning Committee) met twice monthly to develop the Eastern Waterfront Master Plan. Working with City Planning Division staff and private consultants, the Committee worked to complete the four tasks outlined at the beginning of the process.

The Master Planning Committee meetings were open to the public and public comment was taken at each of the 22 meetings. Meeting minutes were taken and are available with the City Planning Division office.

Concurrent with the Master Planning Committee work, the Marine Passenger Facilities Committee (Facilities Committee) worked to plan for the long-term development of the former Bath Iron Works site into an intermodal marine passenger terminal complex. The Facilities Committee public process is described in detail in the Ocean Gateway Project Master Plan Report, April 2001.

Waterfront Development and Master Planning Committee Membership

The Waterfront Master Planning Committee was comprised of citizen representatives from all of Portland’s voting districts as well as representatives from the working waterfront, down town business owners, and the neighborhoods directly impacted by proposed development.

Karen Geraghty, Vice-Chair, Portland City Council

Peter O'Donnell, Vice-Chair, Portland City Council

Frank Akers, Taxpayers Association

Erno Bonebakker, Waterfront Alliance

John Carroll, Peaks Island Neighborhood

Kris Clark, District 2 Representative

Jim Cloutier, Portland City Council

Nan Cummings, Executive Director Portland Trails

Jack Dawson, Portland City Council

David Fink, Guilford Rail

Jim Gilbert, India Street Neighborhood Rep

Lincoln Good, Maine Narrow Gauge Railroad

Will Gorham, Munjoy Hill Neighborhood Organization

Cyrus Hagge, Island Advisory Committee

Jack Humenac, ILA

Luke MacFadyen, Munjoy Hill Neighborhood

Mark Malone, Portland Planning Board

PD Merrill, Merrill's Marine Terminal

Ted Ney, Old Port Retail & Restaurant Assoc

Joe Payne, Bay Keeper, Friends of Casco Bay

Paul Peck, Chamber of Commerce

Donald W. Perkins, Jr., President Gulf of Maine Aquarium

Michael Pizzo, District 5 Representative

Charlie Poole, Union Wharf

Michael Quint, Legislative Representative

Tom Ranello, District 4 Representative

Elizabeth Sheehan, Coastal Enterprises, Inc.

Paul Sherr, Maine Narrow Gauge Railroad

Phineas Sprague, Fore Street Property Owners

Ken Swanburg, Cheverus High School

Barbara Vestal, Greater Portland Landmarks

Ron Ward, Portland Downtown District

Barbara M. Whitten, President Convention & Visitors Bureau

Steve Williams, District 3 Representative

Staff and Consultants

The City of Portland Planning Office acted as staff to the Committee and provided administrative and technical support to the planning process.

Planning Staff included: Alexander Jaegerman, Chief Planner

Alan Holt, Urban Designer

Bill Needelman, Senior Planner

Administrative support was provided by Annie Wadleigh, Greater Portland Council of Governments

ICON Architecture from Boston, MA led the consultant team providing design, traffic engineering, regulatory review, and financial analysis for the Master Planning Process. Other members of the ICON team included:

Wilbur Smith Associates (traffic engineering)

Portscape (port zoning and regulations)

Norris & Norris (architects)

FXM Associates (financial and market analysis)

a. Principles Committee and Subcommittee Process

The Master Planning Committee formed a small subcommittee to draft principles of development in the Eastern Waterfront. A statement of principles was one of the four primary tasks required of the committee, and the principles work set the stage for all later committee work by providing an evaluative framework.

The full committee provided prioritized data for the subcommittee’s use in the form of draft statements that were voted on in a "dot exercise." Each committee member was given five votes to use spread between the 23 draft statements. The following results provided the basis for committee discussion and subcommittee draft language. The resulting principles, as seen in the full report, are of equal value, but the prioritized data is included here to inform the reader as to committee concerns and priorities.

Waterfront Development and Waterfront Master Planning Draft Principles

Rated according to votes cast at May 14, 2001 meeting

10. Development should encourage diversification of the study area through appropriate mixed use. (27 votes)

17. Development should be compatible with the prevailing uses in the surrounding neighborhoods, and must pay particular attention to issues of noise, traffic and parking, air quality, water quality and scale. (21 votes)

19. Any proposed development will require an analysis of the fiscal and management impact on the city to ensure a positive economic return to the City government. (20 votes)

13. Improve environmental health and quality in the harbor/waterfront. (20 votes)

14. Encourage 365/7 uses throughout the study area. (20 votes)

20. Development should preserve and encourage long-term enhancement of emerging and traditional maritime and water dependent use along the water’s edge, as well as encourage sustainable waterfront-dependent employment. (18 votes)

3. Public access should be enhanced and maintained including green space. (14 votes)

4. Mixed landside uses, including existing tenants and, potentially, new development, present important opportunities to generate revenue stream that support infrastructure dedicated to water-dependent uses. (13 votes)

2. Sustain and strengthen tourism based industry that is water related and will enhance resident and visitor quality of life and enhance the overall economic impact of Portland. (11 votes)

16. Encourage historic preservation compatible architecture and adaptive reuse. (10 votes)

8. While Portland waterfront serves a variety of functions, its primary role is to support waterfront dependent uses which cannot exist elsewhere. (10 votes)

5. Public investment and development should be for the benefit and use of the residents of the greater Portland community. (9 votes)

12. Minimize impacts on users of island ferry transportation: traffic congestion, parking availability, and public safety concerns. (9 votes)

18. Establish a public infrastructure overlay that connects the study area with the surrounding street fabric. (9 votes)

23. Any harbor uses should remain marine-related and ideally should take advantage of the natural deep-water resources of the area. (9 votes)

11. Identify and preserve view corridors to and from water and along the waterfront. (8 votes)

22. Development should provide adaptable, flexible infrastructure which will allow the City to adjust to future technologies and trends. (7 votes)

1. Development should enhance the economic viability of waterfront property and facilities. (4 votes)

15. Create or enhance private development opportunities with appropriate design guidelines and land use controls. (1 vote)

6. Adjacent land focus landside uses should be marine related.

7. Improve upon island passenger operations.

9. Preserve and enhance traditional maritime and water related uses along water’s edge.

21. Development should encourage long-term enhancement of waterfront economics and sustainable waterfront-related employment with good paying jobs.

The Principles Subcommittee condensed, edited, and redrafted the prioritized data in to the Statement of Principles for Redevelopment of the Eastern Waterfront. The full Committee reviewed the material and adopted the Principle unanimously on June 11, 2001.

b. Design Guidelines Subcommittee

A small subcommittee of the Master Planning Committee met through the winter of ’01 and ’02 to produce the guidelines. The subcommittee was comprised of waterfront property owners, legal professionals, lay citizenry, Portland Trails, and included three former chairs of the Portland Planning Board. City staff assisted the Subcommittee with representation from the Planning Division, the Waterfront Office, and the Historic Preservation program.

The subcommittee used City of Portland planning documents (the B-3, Downtown Urban Design Guidelines and the Historic Resources Design Manual) and design guidelines from other municipalities as examples in the formation of the guidelines document. The subcommittee worked to provide a document that used established principles of urban design and site design to provide guidelines tailored to the unique context of the Eastern Waterfront area.

The public, the design guideline subcommittee and the full Master Planning Committee all expressed concern that the design of streets, buildings, open space, parking, and changes to the water's edge should contribute to the value of public and private property and the quality of life for Portland residents. The full committee voted to adopt the draft guidelines by a vote of 16 to 3 on January 23, 2002.

The Master Planning Committee and the Facilities Committee ultimately came together to recommend an integrated development scheme based on the funded first phase of the marine passenger terminal. The so-called "Concept 7" plan underlies both the Facilities Committee Ocean Gateway Supplemental Report, dated November 2001, and all of the build out scenarios shown in the Master Plan graphic material.

5. Community Development Committee – CDC (Comprised of three members of the City Council.) Spring 2002

Following the work of the Marine Passenger Terminal Committee and the Waterfront Development and Master Planning Committee, the Community Development Committee (CDC) of the City Council reviewed the integrated master plans prior to final action by the full City Council. At the request of the full City Council, the CDC met through the Spring of 2002 to review of both waterfront committees’ work. Ultimately, the CDC recommended both plans.

Community Development Committee’s recommendation of the Master Plan for Redevelopment of the Eastern Waterfront and the Phase One Ocean Gateway reports was founded in part on the following aspects of the plans:

A. Preservation and enhancement of existing marine infrastructure including:

B. Potential for high value mixed-use development on adjacent upland that is compatible with the marine use of the piers and the shoreline.

The CDC’s recommendation of both the marine use and mixed use redevelopment of the site was informed by the fact that considerable long-term traffic improvements were to be needed in the Franklin Street corridor. The need for these roadway improvements would not be caused by redevelopment in the Eastern Waterfront, but would be necessitated by anticipated background growth in traffic. The CDC studied the potential impacts of traffic on Munjoy Hill and the surrounding street system and found that while waterfront redevelopment was not the root cause of roadway capacity expansions in the area, that capacity increases would be needed as development occurs. The CDC recognized that increasing the capacity of Franklin Street would be needed to keep waterfront related traffic from filtering through Munjoy Hill. The Full CDC report, including the underlying traffic report by Gorrill Palmer Engineers, is available in the City Planning Division office.

6. Community Presentation Forums (hosted by the CDC) May 2002

Following their review of waterfront related projects, the Community Development Committee hosted a series of five public forums with the purpose of presenting the results of Eastern Waterfront Master Planning process. Each forum included an introduction to the waterfront planning process followed by a slide presentation of graphic and written results of the process. The forums concluded with questions and comments from the public. Two of the forums also included an in-depth traffic presentation using an animated computer simulation of current and future traffic conditions demonstrating the impacts of waterfront development. The public discussion notes from each forum are available in the City Planning Division office.

7. Portland City Council

On April 22, 2002 the Portland City Council held a workshop on waterfront development to review the work of the Community Development Committee. On July 3, 2002, the Council held a public hearing on the combined Eastern Waterfront Master Plan and the Ocean Gateway Marine Passenger Terminal Project. After public comment, the Council took three actions: (1) accepting the Ocean Gateway Project Master Plan Report, (2) adopting the Ocean Gateway Project Supplemental Report (this action cleared the way for the phase one marine passenger terminal facility permitting and design), and (3) forwarding the Master Plan for Redevelopment of the Eastern Waterfront to the Planning Board for a recommendation for inclusion into the Comprehensive Plan.

8. Planning Board

At the request of the City Council, the Planning Board held a series of four workshops discussing Master Plan. The first workshop introduced the Board to the process and contents of the Master Plan and scoped out the extend of further review. The second workshop concentrated on traffic impacts to the eastern peninsula with particular emphasis on the Munjoy Hill neighborhood. The third workshop concentrated on water-side operations of the marine passenger terminal and the Ocean Gateway project. The final workshop asked the Board to review the Design Guidelines in detail and to look at the potential zoning implications of implementing the Master Plan. Public Comment was taken at each Planning Board Workshop.

At a September 10, 2002 public hearing, the Planning Board voted to recommend the Master Plan to the City Council. As part of their motion, the Planning Board also recommended that the City work toward constructing a parking garage in the Eastern Waterfront area as soon as possible in order to reduce the amount of surface parking in the district.

9. Zoning Amendments

In the Winter of 2002 and 2003, the Community Development Committee (CDC) and Planning Board began a review of zoning amendments intended to implement the Master Plan. The CDC has held two workshops and the Planning Board has held three workshops reviewing proposed text language and the application of new zones. This work is continuing and is anticipated to conclude in late Spring 2003.